Reasons for location of production
Reasons for Location of Production
Where a business chooses to locate its production facilities — whether a factory, a distribution centre, an office, or a retail site — is one of the most consequential long-term operational decisions it makes. Once made, location decisions are difficult and expensive to reverse: premises are leased or purchased, workforce relationships are built, and supplier networks are established around a specific location. The factors that influence location decisions can be divided into quantitative (measurable, financial) factors and qualitative (non-measurable or harder-to-quantify) factors.
Quantitative factors
Labour costs and availability. For labour-intensive operations, wage rates are a primary cost driver. Businesses in industries where labour represents 40–60% of total costs — such as garment manufacturing, call centres, or assembly operations — are strongly motivated to locate in regions with lower wage rates. Labour availability matters as much as cost: a facility sited in a region without adequate skilled or semi-skilled workers will face chronic recruitment problems regardless of how attractive wage rates appear on paper.
Land and property costs. Factory space, warehouse space, and office accommodation vary significantly in cost between urban and rural locations, and between regions and countries. A logistics distribution centre requires large, flat, well-connected land that is far cheaper outside major cities than within them — explaining the clustering of distribution facilities along motorway corridors and at the periphery of conurbations.
Infrastructure. Transport infrastructure (road, rail, port, airport) determines the ease and cost of moving raw materials in and finished goods out. Proximity to a major port dramatically reduces import and export costs; access to motorway networks reduces delivery times and transport costs. Digital infrastructure — broadband connectivity, data centre proximity — has become an equally important factor for technology-dependent businesses.
Proximity to raw materials. For businesses whose raw materials are heavy, bulky, or expensive to transport, locating close to the source reduces inbound logistics costs significantly. Steel production historically located near coalfields and iron ore deposits; food processing locates near agricultural regions to reduce perishability risk and transport cost.
Proximity to customers (market). For service businesses, retail operations, and businesses where fast delivery is a competitive requirement, proximity to customers is critical. Locating a distribution centre close to the major population centres it serves reduces delivery time and cost. For services delivered in person, being where customers are is an operational necessity.
Qualitative factors
Government incentives. Governments and local authorities often offer financial incentives — grants, tax relief, subsidised infrastructure, or planning permissions — to attract businesses to specific locations, particularly regions with high unemployment or strategic development priorities. These incentives can materially change the financial case for a location, but they are typically time-limited and must be weighed against the ongoing costs and operational characteristics of the location.
Political stability and regulatory environment. For international location decisions, the political stability of the target country, the reliability of its legal system, the protection of intellectual property, and the consistency of its regulatory environment are critical qualitative factors. A country with low labour costs but high political risk may be less attractive than a slightly higher-cost but more stable alternative.
Quality of life for management and skilled workers. Attracting and retaining senior management and specialist technical staff requires offering a working environment and location that meets their personal preferences. Businesses relocating to remote regions may find it difficult to recruit or retain the talent required for leadership and specialist roles, even if local operative labour is abundant.
Meridian Logistics Ltd operates 12 logistics sites across England. When selecting the location for a new automated sorting facility, the site selection team assessed five candidate locations against both quantitative and qualitative criteria. On quantitative criteria: Site A (Northamptonshire, M1 corridor) scored highest for infrastructure (motorway access to the Midlands, North, and South) and land cost (38% lower than the equivalent site near London). Site B (near Birmingham) offered proximity to the largest client cluster but at significantly higher land and labour costs. On qualitative criteria: Site A offered access to a well-established logistics workforce and was within the government's freeport zone, providing a 3-year business rates relief. Site B was assessed as having stronger local government support for logistics sector development. The final decision selected Site A — the motorway infrastructure advantage, land cost saving, and government incentive provided a quantitative case that the client proximity benefit of Site B could not overcome, given that Meridian's delivery network covers the same geography regardless of site location.
Key Takeaways
- Quantitative factors include labour costs and availability, land and property costs, infrastructure quality, proximity to raw materials, and proximity to customers.
- Qualitative factors include government incentives, political stability, regulatory environment, and quality of life for management and skilled workers.
- The relative importance of each factor depends on the nature of the business: labour-intensive operations prioritise labour costs; logistics businesses prioritise infrastructure; service businesses prioritise customer proximity.
- Location decisions are long-term and difficult to reverse — they must be made with careful analysis of both quantitative costs and qualitative strategic factors.
- Government incentives can materially alter the financial case for a location but are typically time-limited — the underlying cost and operational characteristics of the site matter more for long-term sustainability.